Manually Refining The Copy.while,

[dbdataseo]

They Needed To Be Changed To Sentence Case.passive Voice Was Commonly Used Throughout The Article.in The Bulleted Sections, The Style Guide Didn’t Like The Use Of Capital Letters Following A Colon (Unless The Next Word Was A Proper Noun).based On My Time Stamps, It Took Me About Minutes To Address The Suggestions Sufficiently To Move The Article Into The Next Phase.my Revisions (Subjective)after Working Through The Low-hanging Fruit – Grammatical And Stylistic Errors – I Read The Article Thoroughly To Determine How Much Rewriting Might Need To Be Done.

Here, I Focused On Percentages – Was I % Of The Way There? %? %?! Yet, I qatar phone number library Also Kept In Mind The Stated Intention Of This Exercise: To Keep The Article As Close As Possible To The Ai-generated Draft While Still Meeting Everyone’s Standards (Cmis, Yours, And Mine).my Conclusion Was That The Ai-generated Draft Got Me About % Of The Way To Achieving That Goal Without Requiring Any Fundamental Intervention On My Part. But I Did Have A Few Thoughts About What Would Help Bring The Article Into Better Alignment With The Editorial Guidelines I Received From Cmi:in Contrast To Many Of The Cmi Articles I Reviewed For My Reference, The Ai-generated Draft Seemed To Lack A Clear Voice Or Personality.



In Retrospect, This Isn’t Surprising. But, To Really Make The Article My Own, I Would Need To Invest Much More Time On The Whole, The Draft Might Have Lacked A Strong “author” Personality, There Were Still Passages Where Cowrite Varied Its Writing Style And Approach To Make The Content More Engaging.some Sections Contained Repetitive Phrasing Or Sentences That Didn’t Really Add Anything Useful To The Conversation. Most Of The Time, I Simply Removed Those Passages, Though I Used Writer’s Rewrite Feature (Currently In Beta) To Simplify Or Enrich Some Redundant Phrases.