" What is your response to this? People are worried about retaliation, and I don't want to talk about the stock issue because I know you apologized and corrected this. But if they have concerns, shouldn't they be allowed to express them? I know different people have different views. ir ri: Of course, we think the debate is very important, and it's also very important to be able to express these concerns openly and discuss security issues. We have been very open about the issue of disinformation since the founding of I, and since the G-era, this has been one of the issues we worked on early on.
The past few years have been incredibly fast indonesia phone number details and faster than expected, and this has also increased people's general anxiety about society's readiness. We see where the science is going, so it's understandable that people are worried about the future. Specifically, the work we do at I and the way we deploy these models, I think we have an excellent team, we deploy these models very safely, and I'm very proud of that. Given the speed of technological progress and our own progress, it's very important to focus on security, protection frameworks, and we need to think about how to think about the risks of training and deploying cutting-edge models.
Moderator: How do you deal with him? I understand this dynamic. This happened at Google, Microsoft in its early days, and Amazon. As companies grow, things change. Google was very chaotic in its early days, and Facebook has been through so much that I can't even count them. There are many people who have walked that path. This is normal, but how do you deal with it? For example, he has invested in some foreign companies, and some companies have business dealings with I. He invested in .$7.5 billion in an energy company called Hli, which is a cool company, and they're currently talking to I about a lot of power requirements.