You list things like X, I have or I am an
Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 3:12 am
So there's some existing content that you find on the web, you track down the author of that content or the publisher of that content, and you make a connection, usually through social, through email, or through direct comments on that content. You have an additional resource of some kind that has the potential to be included, either in that particular element or in a future element.
It works really well with bloggers. It works well with journalists. It works well with people who cover data and studies. It works well with people who are adding visuals or tools to their content. As a result, it works well if you can improve on one of those things, like data or visuals or info-bait. Or supporting evidence works really well. If you have chile number data who is trying to argue with their content and you have evidence that can help support that argument, often just a comment can get you on the main post, because that person wants to show what you have.
It doesn't work very well with commercial content. So it's a strategy flaw.
So instead of saying, "I want a link," this is a very indirect or relatively indirect ploy for the same thing. You find resources that list Xs, and there's usually a process for either authorship or submission, but you don't have to beg for links. You can instead just say, "I meet your criteria."
So it could be, "Hey, are there any websites in the educational world that are ADA compliant and accessible to people?" You could say, "Well, guess what? I am that. So, all these places that list resources like that, that are ADA compliant, would fit in here."
It works really well with bloggers. It works well with journalists. It works well with people who cover data and studies. It works well with people who are adding visuals or tools to their content. As a result, it works well if you can improve on one of those things, like data or visuals or info-bait. Or supporting evidence works really well. If you have chile number data who is trying to argue with their content and you have evidence that can help support that argument, often just a comment can get you on the main post, because that person wants to show what you have.
It doesn't work very well with commercial content. So it's a strategy flaw.
So instead of saying, "I want a link," this is a very indirect or relatively indirect ploy for the same thing. You find resources that list Xs, and there's usually a process for either authorship or submission, but you don't have to beg for links. You can instead just say, "I meet your criteria."
So it could be, "Hey, are there any websites in the educational world that are ADA compliant and accessible to people?" You could say, "Well, guess what? I am that. So, all these places that list resources like that, that are ADA compliant, would fit in here."