In a landmark decision, Justice Edson
Posted: Thu Feb 20, 2025 6:07 am
The accounts of people impacted by police violence, the numbers and independent examinations carried out by international bodies prove that there is a policy of genocide of the black population in Brazil, and in particular in Rio de Janeiro, through direct action and omission by the State. And in view of this unacceptable conclusion, the “ADPF das Favelas” has been used as a tool to confront structural and systemic racism in the country.
Fachin, the rapporteur of the case, accepted the request for a temporary suspension of all non-essential police operations in Rio de Janeiro during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a survey by the Study Group on New Illegalities at the Fluminense Federal University (GENI/UFF), it can be said that the restriction of police operations saved at least 288 lives in 2020.
At the international level, the UN Human Rights Council adopted tunisia mobile database Resolution 43/1 of 2020 in response to global protests following the murder of George Floyd in the United States, aiming to “promote and protect the human rights of Africans and people of African descent in the face of excessive use of force and other violations by security agents”. Through this regulation, an international mechanism was created to investigate the causes of systemic racism in different parts of the world and to submit recommendations that illuminate the interpretation of States’ international obligations.
Prompted by Resolution 43/1, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) published a report on racism and police violence in the world in June 2021. Conectas was one of the organizations engaged in the international advocacy tactic that ensured the preparation of the document, the updating of the Resolution and the continuation of the debate on the topic in the Council. There are some mentions of Brazil in the report, with emphasis on ADPF 635, listed as an example of a “Way to Follow”.
Strategic litigation as an advocacy tool enables the legal challenge of practices and policies that impede full access to rights and guarantees. For this reason, and as we have attempted to demonstrate through some practical examples, litigating in a “strategic” manner can make a difference in the political impact attempted by civil society organizations, movements, collectives or even institutions, both in national and international spaces.
Fachin, the rapporteur of the case, accepted the request for a temporary suspension of all non-essential police operations in Rio de Janeiro during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to a survey by the Study Group on New Illegalities at the Fluminense Federal University (GENI/UFF), it can be said that the restriction of police operations saved at least 288 lives in 2020.
At the international level, the UN Human Rights Council adopted tunisia mobile database Resolution 43/1 of 2020 in response to global protests following the murder of George Floyd in the United States, aiming to “promote and protect the human rights of Africans and people of African descent in the face of excessive use of force and other violations by security agents”. Through this regulation, an international mechanism was created to investigate the causes of systemic racism in different parts of the world and to submit recommendations that illuminate the interpretation of States’ international obligations.
Prompted by Resolution 43/1, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) published a report on racism and police violence in the world in June 2021. Conectas was one of the organizations engaged in the international advocacy tactic that ensured the preparation of the document, the updating of the Resolution and the continuation of the debate on the topic in the Council. There are some mentions of Brazil in the report, with emphasis on ADPF 635, listed as an example of a “Way to Follow”.
Strategic litigation as an advocacy tool enables the legal challenge of practices and policies that impede full access to rights and guarantees. For this reason, and as we have attempted to demonstrate through some practical examples, litigating in a “strategic” manner can make a difference in the political impact attempted by civil society organizations, movements, collectives or even institutions, both in national and international spaces.